Back to all cases

Statistical Inference

Time Series Impact Analysis and Counterfactual Forecasting

Evaluation of whether an observed change in a metric was caused by an intervention or by trend, seasonality, or noise.

Category
Statistical Inference
Level
Advanced
Dataset type
Simulated
Methods
Time Series Inference, Forecasting, Counterfactual Analysis, Interrupted Time Series, Confidence Intervals
Tools
Python, R, Power BI
Links
Coming soon

Dataset type: simulated. No confidential client or employer data.

Executive Summary

This case estimates whether a visible change in a time-dependent metric is consistent with an intervention effect after accounting for baseline trend, seasonality and noise.

Business Question

Did the intervention change the metric beyond what would have been expected under the pre-intervention trajectory?

Statistical Question / Hypothesis

The null hypothesis is that the post-intervention period follows the counterfactual path implied by pre-intervention behavior. The alternative is that the observed post-period departs from that expected path by a practically meaningful amount.

Dataset

The dataset is simulated as a weekly metric series with pre-period history, intervention date, trend, seasonality and comparison features. It is structured to separate intervention timing from recurring calendar effects.

Methodology

The analysis compares observed post-intervention values with a counterfactual forecast. It uses interrupted time series framing, forecast uncertainty and interval-based interpretation rather than relying on a simple before-after comparison.

Implementation

Python and R are used for decomposition, model diagnostics, counterfactual estimation and uncertainty intervals. Power BI is used only for executive reporting once the statistical outputs are stable.

Results

The output is an estimated cumulative impact, pointwise deviation from counterfactual and an uncertainty range. The result supports decisions only when the observed deviation is large enough to be both statistically and operationally relevant.

Limitations

The main limitations are unobserved concurrent events, limited pre-period length, structural breaks, model misspecification and overinterpretation when the intervention date is not sharply defined.

Executive Recommendation

Use the estimated counterfactual gap as directional evidence for rollout or investigation. When uncertainty remains wide, extend the observation window or add a matched comparison series.

Tools Used

Python, R and Power BI.

Notebook, GitHub repository and executive PDF are coming soon.